Shell ladder for conformity and fall-off
Five concentric shells at different distances, each doing a different job — conformity, fall-off, then spillage.
Built in·updated 2026-08-03
A single ring is the beginner's version. The published method uses five shells at 2, 5, 10, 15 and 25 mm from the target margin, and the distances are not arbitrary — each band controls a different part of the distribution:
- 2 mm — conformity. This is the one that shapes the prescription isodose to the target.
- 5 and 10 mm — the fall-off. These are what buy you gradient index.
- 15 and 25 mm — spillage. Low-dose control, out where the isodose has already dropped to 10–30%.
Start with target and shell weights at 1.0 and an MU penalty of 1.0, then move one shell at a time.
The alternative. Precision also has a Normal Tissue Objective, which does the same job with three reference points instead of five structures — 100% at the margin, 50% at 5 mm, 20% at 100 mm. In a 2025 comparison the NTO produced a 7% better gradient index on meningiomas (3.19 vs 3.44), 11% less V12Gy (1.99 vs 2.25 cc) and 10% shorter treatment (48.8 vs 54.1 min), with no MU difference. Conformity was within 2%.
So the shell ladder is worth knowing because it explains what you are controlling; the NTO is often the faster way to control it.
Where the numbers come from
- Comparative evaluation of normal tissue objective functions in robotic radiosurgery planning for solitary brain tumors
PMC · 2025
NTO vs 5-shell auto-shells: GI 3.19 vs 3.44, V12Gy 1.99 vs 2.25 cc, treatment 48.8 vs 54.1 min
- CyberKnife dosimetric planning using a dose-limiting shell method for brain metastases
PubMed · 2018
Multiple shells at increasing distance outperform a single 3 mm shell