Sparing structures nobody scored you on
Constrictors and larynx can be spared at no measurable cost to target coverage or parotid dose. Most head and neck plans simply never ask.
Built in·updated 2026-08-03
In head and neck SIB plans the scored organs are usually parotids, cord and brainstem. The swallowing structures — pharyngeal constrictors, split into upper, middle and lower, and the glottic and supraglottic larynx — often appear in no objective at all.
Adding mean-dose objectives for the upper constrictor and supraglottic larynx, leaving every other objective unchanged, reduced their mean dose by 3.9 and 4.5 Gy respectively. V60 fell from 82% to 65% for the upper constrictor and 63% to 46% for the supraglottic larynx, with modelled grade 2–4 swallowing dysfunction down 9.2%.
Target coverage and parotid sparing were unchanged. The dose was going into those structures because nothing asked for it not to.
The general lesson, which is the reason this is a skill and not a protocol. Dose lands wherever no objective forbids it. Before the last optimization, look at the structures you never wrote an objective for and ask whether any of them matter. On a scored challenge this wins nothing directly — and a write-up that mentions it is teaching something the leaderboard cannot measure, which is most of the point of writing one.
Where the numbers come from
- VMAT and simultaneous integrated boost in head-and-neck cancer: is there a place for critical swallowing structures dose sparing?
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother · 2016
uPCM and SGL mean dose −3.9 and −4.5 Gy, V60 82→65% and 63→46%, no loss of coverage or parotid sparing
- VMAT in head and neck radiotherapy: a planning comparison using SIB for nasopharynx and oropharynx carcinoma
PubMed · 2011
SIB VMAT matched dynamic IMRT with roughly one third of the monitor units