Collimator angle and jaw tracking on a C-arm
Two settings most planners leave at default that measurably change the plan, especially with multiple targets.
Built in·updated 2026-08-03
Collimator angle is rotated away from 0° to break up the tongue-and-groove effect and interleaf leakage, which otherwise line up along the same axis for the whole arc. For dual-arc plans, using orthogonal angles (0° and 90°) reduced homogeneity index and gradient measure across several organs compared with the usual small offsets.
Jaw tracking closes the jaws to the active leaf aperture as the arc runs, removing transmission through the closed leaves. Adding jaw tracking together with automatic collimator angle selection improved both target and normal-tissue metrics in non-coplanar cranial VMAT.
Where it matters most: single-isocentre multiple targets. With several targets on one isocentre, the leaf pairs open for one target while another target sits in the same row — the "island blocking" problem. Collimator angle is the main tool for arranging the targets so their rows do not collide, and it is a per-plan decision rather than a departmental default.
Splitting the field. For a large target, restricting each field to about 15 cm and splitting into two overlapping fields — four arcs total — raised modulation and conformity and improved OAR sparing.
Where the numbers come from
- Dosimetric effects of dynamic jaw tracking and collimator angle optimization in non-coplanar cranial arc radiotherapy
Med Dosim · 2023
Jaw tracking + automatic collimator angle improved target and normal-tissue metrics
- Dosimetric analysis of orthogonal collimator configuration in volumetric modulated arc therapy planning
PMC · 2025
Orthogonal 0°/90° dual arc lowered homogeneity index and gradient measure